<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter vs Tumblr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.abluestar.com/blog/twitter-vs-tumblr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.abluestar.com/blog/twitter-vs-tumblr/</link>
	<description>Rantings from Steven smethurst</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: B M</title>
		<link>http://www.abluestar.com/blog/twitter-vs-tumblr/#comment-1631</link>
		<dc:creator>B M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.abluestar.com/blog/twitter-vs-tumblr/#comment-1631</guid>
		<description>-&#62; I really like THEIR theme viewer/editor
-&#62; THEY'RE both pretty much the same

I may be picky, but I still think you should use proper grammar if your page is the first hit on Google for "tumblr vs twitter." Oh, and "would've" is the contraction of "would have," not "would of" (just in case). I hate how many people make that mistake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-&gt; I really like THEIR theme viewer/editor<br />
-&gt; THEY&#8217;RE both pretty much the same</p>
<p>I may be picky, but I still think you should use proper grammar if your page is the first hit on Google for &#8220;tumblr vs twitter.&#8221; Oh, and &#8220;would&#8217;ve&#8221; is the contraction of &#8220;would have,&#8221; not &#8220;would of&#8221; (just in case). I hate how many people make that mistake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
